Plasma cell disorders
Proteasome inhibitor, IMiD, daratumumab and oral SACT protocols.
Feasibility evaluation build. Do not enter identifying patient information. SACTCheck compares the information entered with NCCP protocol criteria. It does not prescribe or authorise treatment. Verify the current NCCP protocol and apply clinical judgement.
Find the correct regimen, assess the clinical information available, see the encoded criterion beside each result and verify the official NCCP source.
Why it exists: to reduce repeated protocol searching without hiding the reasoning or removing clinician control.
Fifteen protocols linked to official NCCP sources use the shared SACTCheck assessment engine. Any relevant single value can be assessed and missing fields remain unassessed.
Proteasome inhibitor, IMiD, daratumumab and oral SACT protocols.
Reserved for a later independently validated batch.
Reserved for a later independently validated batch.
Find the current NCCP regimen, confirm the tissue specific indication and open a structured day ward assessment.
Strengthens source fidelity, rule provenance, input roles, protocol maturity labelling, source reconciled breast pathways, search safety and validation transparency. Formal independent clinical and oncology pharmacy validation remains pending.
Results update as you type. Press Enter to jump to the first match or / to focus search.
Describe a de-identified oncology scenario in ordinary clinical language. SACTCheck will identify possible NCCP regimens for you to confirm before opening the structured protocol assessment.
No scenario interpreted yet.
It identifies possible disease and regimen terms, ranks matching protocols and requires you to select the exact NCCP regimen. The existing in-regimen interpreter then extracts candidate clinical values for confirmation. Only confirmed values are passed to the deterministic SACTCheck engine.
Each tissue page carries a stable icon and colour throughout its catalogue section. Search still covers the entire library.
NCCP 00226 · Version 9
PACLitaxel 80 mg/m² on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 28-day cycle.
NCCP 00209 · Version 10a
Longitudinal blood-count tracking and component-specific dose modification.
NCCP 00227 · Version 9
Irinotecan and 5-FU dose levels, delayed-count nadirs, diarrhoea, stomatitis, renal and hepatic rules.
NCCP 00303 · Version 6
21-day regimen with carboplatin renal checks, hepatic paclitaxel dosing and neuropathy pathways.
NCCP 00624 · Version 3
Platinum-sensitive relapse with haematology, hepatic, PPE, stomatitis and cardiac review pathways.
Local/current source required
No current NCCP SACT regimen was located in the official gynaecology library. Add once the approved local or NCCP protocol is supplied.
NCCP 00321 · Version 9
Mixed IV and oral regimen with count nadirs, renal adjustment, hand-foot syndrome, diarrhoea, stomatitis and oxaliplatin neuropathy rules.
NCCP 00329 · Version 9
Metastatic pancreatic cancer regimen with haematology, renal, hepatic, diarrhoea, stomatitis and oxaliplatin neuropathy rules.
NCCP 00515 · Version 7
Pancreatic cancer regimen with occurrence-based blood-count and component-specific dose modification.
NCCP 00383 · Version 8
Day 1/day 8 assessment with gemcitabine percentage dosing and cisplatin renal branching.
Herskovic · NCCP 00460 · Version 4
Oesophageal chemoradiation with haematology, renal, hepatic and toxicity criteria.
NCCP 00568 · Version 5
First-line metastatic non-squamous NSCLC without EGFR or ALK-positive mutations.
NCCP 00655 · Version 3a
Durvalumab 1500 mg every 28 days after concurrent platinum-based chemoradiation for Stage III NSCLC.
NCCP 00271 · Version 6
21-day regimen for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer, with IV or IV/oral etoposide schedules.
This workspace provides a structured primary clinical review across every enabled protocol and every tissue context in which a shared protocol is used. Each review is compared with the current NCCP source and recorded domain by domain.
Purpose: identify discrepancies early, document corrections clearly and create a reproducible record that can later support consultant oncology and oncology pharmacy validation.
Local reviewer workspace: review records are stored in this browser on this device until you export them. Export the JSON validation log regularly and before clearing browser data or changing devices. Do not enter patient names, identifiers or clinical case data.
Progress is counted by tissue context so a shared regimen can be reviewed separately for each indication group.
Reviewer identity is stored only in the local validation log and exported files.
Select a tissue to work through its complete review queue.
Open a regimen, review each domain against the complete NCCP source and log any discrepancy before moving on.
The NCCP Change Tracker shows whether each registered regimen is linked to the latest reviewed NCCP source, identifies new or changed protocols and makes the review state visible before any SACTCheck content is updated.
DetectIdentify new or changed NCCP protocol sources.
ComparePresent the previous and current source together.
ReviewPrioritise possible treatment, safety and information changes.
ReconcileRecord the approved SACTCheck response and release.
A source change is a signal for review, not permission to update a clinical rule.
Each capability is designed to improve source visibility, prioritisation and governance rather than replace clinical review.
Detected changes remain visible until their review state is recorded.
Every registered protocol is linked to its NCCP version, official source, review state and SACTCheck reconciliation history.
The tracker supports surveillance and review. It does not independently determine whether a change is clinically correct, applicable or safe.
Required control: No detected change can modify a clinical rule automatically. A detected source change must be reviewed against the current NCCP PDF, reconciled with the encoded SACTCheck content, tested and approved before publication. The official NCCP protocol and local governance remain authoritative.
Boundary implementation: a platelet count of exactly 90 ×10⁹/L is assigned to the protocol row stating platelets ≥90. The subsequent row is implemented as 70 to <90 to avoid overlap.
Open source protocolScope of this prototype: day-1 haematology and delayed-week nadirs, renal/hepatic impairment, DPD status, neuropathy, diarrhoea, stomatitis, laryngo-pharyngeal dysaesthesia and pulmonary warning symptoms. Any modification should be discussed with a Consultant.
Open source protocolScope: haematology and delayed-week nadirs, DPD status, renal/hepatic impairment, diarrhoea and stomatitis.
Open source protocolThis validates the file locally in this browser. It does not upload patient information or permanently publish a protocol.
This local preview checks file structure only. Clinical source review, oncology pharmacy review and release approval remain separate governance steps.
Find. Assess. Explain. Verify.
SACTCheck turns encoded NCCP protocol criteria into a structured clinician-facing workflow. It helps you find the right regimen, assess the information available and see the basis for every result.
Current day-ward workflow can require repeated navigation of long protocols, multiple tables and regimen-specific exceptions under time pressure. SACTCheck is designed to reduce that search burden without hiding the decision logic.
To make protocol-based oncology treatment assessment easier to navigate, more consistent to perform and transparent to review—while keeping the clinician and the official NCCP source in control.
Compares clinician-entered laboratory and toxicity information with encoded regimen criteria and labels each domain as meeting criteria, not meeting criteria or unassessed.
Structured assessmentDay-ward review can involve repeated searching across lengthy protocol documents, treatment phases and drug-specific dose-modification tables. SACTCheck is designed to reduce friction and avoid hidden reasoning.
Less search burdenThe entered value, encoded criterion and resulting action are displayed together. Missing information stays visibly unassessed, and the official NCCP protocol remains one click away.
Visible decision basisThis feasibility build examines usability, completion time, output clarity and agreement with independently adjudicated protocol-based answers before any consideration of routine deployment.
Feasibility evidencePatient-specific protocol explanation
Clinical criteria