Treatment assessment
Regimen-specific checks with the NCCP criteria and reasoning alongside the result.
From clinic to home
Connecting treatment assessment, clinical knowledge and clear patient information throughout the cancer treatment journey.
Results update as you type. Press Enter to jump to the first match or / to focus search.
Find a regimen above, then open the support you need. Available resources vary by regimen.
Regimen-specific checks with the NCCP criteria and reasoning alongside the result.
Clinical knowledge, consent drafts, supportive care and NCCP source documents in one place.
Visual treatment information, practical guidance and timelines to help patients know what to expect.
Expected blood tests, scans and other checks mapped across the stages of treatment.
Do not enter identifying patient information. Verify the current NCCP protocol and apply clinical judgement.
Fifteen protocols linked to official NCCP sources use the shared SACTCheck assessment engine. Any relevant single value can be assessed and missing fields remain unassessed.
Proteasome inhibitor, IMiD, daratumumab and oral SACT protocols.
Reserved for a later independently validated batch.
Reserved for a later independently validated batch.
Find the exact regimen, then open the clinical workflow, patient guide, source material or sustainability support you need.
Source-reconciled assessments connect treatment rationale, clinician evidence, patient information, consent and supportive care. New routes and schedules include oral vinorelbine, continuous lapatinib with capecitabine breaks, and phase-specific heart monitoring. Independent clinical and pharmacy review remains pending.
Each tissue page carries a stable icon and colour throughout its catalogue section. Search still covers the entire library.
These filters organise the catalogue; they do not determine treatment eligibility. General chemotherapy cards remain under “receptor-unrestricted / not specified”. Maintenance is a treatment phase, and may also appear under its disease setting.
NCCP 00226 · Version 9
PACLitaxel 80 mg/m² on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 28-day cycle.
NCCP 00209 · Version 10a
Longitudinal blood-count tracking and component-specific dose modification.
NCCP 00227 · Version 9
Irinotecan and 5-FU dose levels, delayed-count nadirs, diarrhoea, stomatitis, renal and hepatic rules.
NCCP 00303 · Version 6
21-day regimen with carboplatin renal checks, hepatic paclitaxel dosing and neuropathy pathways.
NCCP 00624 · Version 3
Platinum-sensitive relapse with haematology, hepatic, PPE, stomatitis and cardiac review pathways.
Local/current source required
No current NCCP SACT regimen was located in the official gynaecology library. Add once the approved local or NCCP protocol is supplied.
NCCP 00321 · Version 9
Mixed IV and oral regimen with count nadirs, renal adjustment, hand-foot syndrome, diarrhoea, stomatitis and oxaliplatin neuropathy rules.
NCCP 00329 · Version 9
Metastatic pancreatic cancer regimen with haematology, renal, hepatic, diarrhoea, stomatitis and oxaliplatin neuropathy rules.
NCCP 00515 · Version 7
Pancreatic cancer regimen with occurrence-based blood-count and component-specific dose modification.
NCCP 00383 · Version 8
Day 1/day 8 assessment with gemcitabine percentage dosing and cisplatin renal branching.
Herskovic · NCCP 00460 · Version 4
Oesophageal chemoradiation with haematology, renal, hepatic and toxicity criteria.
NCCP 00568 · Version 5
First-line metastatic non-squamous NSCLC without EGFR or ALK-positive mutations.
NCCP 00655 · Version 3a
Durvalumab 1500 mg every 28 days after concurrent platinum-based chemoradiation for Stage III NSCLC.
NCCP 00271 · Version 6
21-day regimen for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer, with IV or IV/oral etoposide schedules.
This workspace provides a structured primary clinical review across every enabled protocol and every tissue context in which a shared protocol is used. Each review is compared with the current NCCP source and recorded domain by domain.
Purpose: identify discrepancies early, document corrections clearly and create a reproducible record that can later support consultant oncology and oncology pharmacy validation.
Local reviewer workspace: review records are stored in this browser on this device until you export them. Export the JSON validation log regularly and before clearing browser data or changing devices. Do not enter patient names, identifiers or clinical case data.
Progress is counted by tissue context so a shared regimen can be reviewed separately for each indication group.
Reviewer identity is stored only in the local validation log and exported files.
Select a tissue to work through its complete review queue.
Open a regimen, review each domain against the complete NCCP source and log any discrepancy before moving on.
The NCCP Change Tracker shows whether each registered regimen is linked to the latest reviewed NCCP source, identifies new or changed protocols and makes the review state visible before any SACTCheck content is updated.
DetectIdentify new or changed NCCP protocol sources.
ComparePresent the previous and current source together.
ReviewPrioritise possible treatment, safety and information changes.
ReconcileRecord the approved SACTCheck response and release.
A source change is a signal for review, not permission to update a clinical rule.
Each capability is designed to improve source visibility, prioritisation and governance rather than replace clinical review.
Detected changes remain visible until their review state is recorded.
Every registered protocol is linked to its NCCP version, official source, review state and SACTCheck reconciliation history.
The tracker supports surveillance and review. It does not independently determine whether a change is clinically correct, applicable or safe.
Required control: No detected change can modify a clinical rule automatically. A detected source change must be reviewed against the current NCCP PDF, reconciled with the encoded SACTCheck content, tested and approved before publication. The official NCCP protocol and local governance remain authoritative.
Boundary implementation: a platelet count of exactly 90 ×10⁹/L is assigned to the protocol row stating platelets ≥90. The subsequent row is implemented as 70 to <90 to avoid overlap.
Open source protocolScope of this prototype: day-1 haematology and delayed-week nadirs, renal/hepatic impairment, DPD status, neuropathy, diarrhoea, stomatitis, laryngo-pharyngeal dysaesthesia and pulmonary warning symptoms. Any modification should be discussed with a Consultant.
Open source protocolScope: haematology and delayed-week nadirs, DPD status, renal/hepatic impairment, diarrhoea and stomatitis.
Open source protocolThis validates the file locally in this browser. It does not upload patient information or permanently publish a protocol.
This local preview checks file structure only. Clinical source review, oncology pharmacy review and release approval remain separate governance steps.
Find. Assess. Explain. Verify.
SACTCheck structures regimen-specific NCCP information across clinical workflow, patient education, supportive care, evidence and sustainability while preserving direct access to the authoritative source.
Current day-ward workflow can require repeated navigation of long protocols, multiple tables and regimen-specific exceptions under time pressure. SACTCheck is designed to reduce that search burden without hiding the decision logic.
For clinicians: structured laboratory and toxicity assessment, transparent criteria, source links, evidence summaries and supportive-care resources.
For patients: treatment explanations, visual side-effect information, cycle timelines and QR-linked resources where available.
For development: clinical and pharmacy review, source-change tracking and planned iterative patient and public involvement. Digital resources are intended to support reusable information and reduce unnecessary printing; benefits remain to be evaluated.
To make protocol-based oncology treatment assessment easier to navigate, more consistent to perform and transparent to review—while keeping the clinician and the official NCCP source in control.
Compares clinician-entered laboratory and toxicity information with encoded regimen criteria and labels each domain as meeting criteria, not meeting criteria or unassessed.
Structured assessmentDay-ward review can involve repeated searching across lengthy protocol documents, treatment phases and drug-specific dose-modification tables. SACTCheck is designed to reduce friction and avoid hidden reasoning.
Less search burdenThe entered value, encoded criterion and resulting action are displayed together. Missing information stays visibly unassessed, and the official NCCP protocol remains one click away.
Visible decision basisThis feasibility build examines usability, completion time, output clarity and agreement with independently adjudicated protocol-based answers before any consideration of routine deployment.
Feasibility evidencePatient-specific protocol explanation
Clinical criteria